Source: Bigstock

Why, for that matter, were they using bombs when a siege would have succeeded if rigorously implemented?

Britain will do as the USA does. Oh, for the days when we had an independent foreign policy.

It is hard to see what interest Britain has in Syria or why chemical weapons that seem to have been used by both sides are worse than other weapons that have been used against civilians, including children, by both sides.

What strategic interest do the U.S. and U.K. have in the Middle East at all besides good trading relations with our Arab friends? These include the Saudi monarchy, which is morally revolting and doing everything it can to spread Wahhabism throughout the world.

I much prefer Iran to the Saudis, whether or not they let women drive, and don’t see why we should go to war for the Saudis and their ally, Israel.

Comments on this article can be sent to the .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and should be accompanied by a name, city and state. Your comment may be published on Taki’s Magazine later this week.