Source: Bigstock

Last week it was annual Holocaust Memorial Day—ironically, I personally failed to remember this fact, otherwise I would have written this present column to fit in with it.

However, I was soon reminded of the occasion after being alerted in the media to the highly surprising information that the Nazis were poised to return to power in Germany in about a month or so’s time now, before immediately re-embarking upon a comprehensive program of reinvading Poland and France, firing V-2s at London, and killing all the Jews.

Germany has national elections in February and, according to the favorite to become the next Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, leader of the “center right” (re: just a tiny little bit less left than the actual left are) Christian Democratic Union (CDU), there is a clear and present danger it might be won by the Nazi Party—even though the Nazi Party no longer exist in Germany at all, being a specifically illegal political organization there. Every time my own country of Great Britain goes to the polls, I feel similar apprehension of a potential looming Whig victory.

Him/Herr Hitler
By “Nazis,” Merz actually means the reputedly “far-right” (re: sane and normal) Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) Party, which is currently occupying second position in the polls, on account of its calls for mass “remigration” of all the Africans and Muslims who have poured into the country ever since Angela Merkel’s socially disastrous Willkommenskultur policies of ten years ago. Far from using the military to extend Germany’s borders, like the real Nazis did, the AfD just wants to defend the nation’s territory from outside invaders instead.

Friedrich Merz’s worry is that such policies actually make good electoral sense—so much so, he is hastily copying them in watered-down, homeopathic fashion. But, if such AfD Lite measures fail, then, come the next election-but-one in 2033, Merz fears the “fascists” might well ride high upon a tide of severe public dissatisfaction and celebrate the centenary of Adolf Hitler taking power by doing so themselves. “Once in ’33 is quite enough for Germany,” is Merz’s rather strange new slogan.

Is 2020s Germany really now a hotbed of far-right poison, as Merz claims, though? I have my doubts. Sven Liebich is a 53-year-old neo-Nazi linked to the AfD, currently serving an eighteen-month sentence, probably in Landsburg Prison, for inciting hatred. But no sooner had Sven entered his cell than he magically developed new chromosomes, changed his name to Marla-Svenja, and demanded to be transferred via cattle truck to a women’s prison instead, by which he definitely didn’t mean Ravensbrück.

Under Germany’s new distinctly un-Nazi gender self-ID laws, Liebich claimed he enjoyed this legal right of transfer in order to be able to avoid “discrimination” from his skeptical all-male fellow camp internees. Isn’t “discrimination” supposed to be precisely the kind of thing genuine Nazis like? If even the nation’s supposed “neo-Nazis” are going woke like this, Germany can’t be in that much danger of suffering a second Holocaust, can it? Didn’t the actual Nazis once kill people like Sven/Svenja, not recruit them?

Ve Haf Vays of Stopping You Talk
Counterintuitively, whilst the sex-swapping AfD “Nazis” of 2020s Germany are currently calling for less “discrimination,” the present ruling left-liberal Chancellor, Olaf Scholz, has begun complaining about “misguided tolerance” being applied toward violent non-white immigrants over the past decade, following the latest stabbing incident in the nation. This one occurred in the Bavarian town of Aschaffenberg, where a failed Afghan asylum seeker killed a toddler (himself of Moroccan descent, fatefully enough) and an adult white male after targeting a kindergarten outing in a park.

This supposed “unprecedented outrage” (unprecedented apart from all the others—there was a previous Islamist plot to distribute poisoned ice cream to German toddlers before blowing the van up outside a kindergarten) was meant to have been the final straw for Scholz, who would now finally get serious about dealing with the Muslims…the very same Muslims that people like him had spent their entire political lives busily trying to import in the name of “love.”

Failed mainstream politicians like Scholz make all the right noises about toughening up on immigration now, mere weeks before an angry public can finally kick them out of office, but during less electorally important times, they far prefer to devote all available resources to silencing those who dare voice opinions contrary to their own murderously utopian multi-kulti fantasies.

In June last year, for instance, a 20-year-old German woman, Maja R, was given a harsher sentence than a Muslim immigrant who had helped gang-rape an underage girl in a park after Maja had contacted him online to call him a “disgusting freak” and a “disgraceful rapist pig,” something German judges deemed a form of defamation.

Defamation how? Defamation means you have to say something false about a person, not something true! He had raped someone, he was found guilty of doing so, in a literal court of law—and was then rapidly let off without any jail time whatsoever, on account of him being underage, just like his victim. His adult insulter Maja R, meanwhile, got a weekend in jail. Maybe the specific “pig” element of her slur was deemed to be Islamophobic?

Once news of this blatant example of two-tier justice got out, it drew much public criticism. German legal authorities then sprang immediately into action—by beginning investigations into around 140 individuals who, by making accurately disparaging comments about the judgment online, had supposedly engaged in “a targeted attack on the rule of law.” In today’s Germany, to correctly observe what the “anti-fascist” State is systematically doing to its own people (i.e., raping and killing them by proxy) is itself now tacitly borderline illegal. I thought leaders like Scholz and Merz disapproved of old Nazi-era bodies like the Gestapo?

Judge This Case for Yourself
Last October, meanwhile, Doris van Geul, a 74-year-old pensioner of good old-fashioned Aryan stock, noticed a Facebook propaganda image of the country’s coalition government Green Party Economics Minister, Robert Habeck, rather debatably stating that “Germany depends on immigration to meet our labor needs.” She also noticed that this was a load of alt scheisse, and so posted online as follows:

Blah, blah, blah. We need skilled workers, not asylum seekers who just want a good life here without respecting our values and culture. Send the ones who are here off to work. We don’t need loafers and freeloaders, and certainly not stabbers and rapists.

The end result? The Dusseldorf Public Prosecutor charged van Geul with the crime of “inciting hatred in a manner likely to disturb the public peace.”

After Frau van Geul defended herself in court, her prosecutor complained that “it sounds as if [the defendant] still doesn’t approve of [Germany’s mass immigration] policies,” an opinion somehow deemed to be “antidemocratic” in its nature—unlike a court apparently mandating to a “free” citizen what the “correct” political opinions to hold upon such matters must henceforth be, which is clearly not antidemocratic in the slightest.

In the name of true democracy, the pensioner was then fined €7,950, to be paid off in regular installments until she was 93 (or, more realistically, until she was dead). What had this poor woman even done? According to the judge, she had made “false” statements about immigrants in Germany. But what was actually false about them? Nothing!

Arabian Blights
Germany today is a land where the laws against insulting politicians and their cherished “anti-Nazi” policies are so insanely strict that to breach them can lead to your home being raided at dawn by squads of armed polizei—even, as I have previously shown here, if you are a harmless pensioner who happened to jokingly call a Minister (that same Robert Habeck again…) a “Professional Dickhead” to his friends on Twitter.

And yet, if you happen to be a Saudi immigrant into the nation, with a known criminal record, German authorities will happily don their blinkers and ignore the fact that you have a photo of an AR-15 assault rifle as your profile image on social media, and openly post things like this upon your account:

(1) “It’s very likely that I will die this year in order to bring justice.”

(2) “I assure you that if Germany wants a war, we will fight it. If Germany wants to kill us, we will slaughter them, die, or go to prison with pride.”

And then, finally, these very same authorities will act as being all surprised when said individual ends up being arrested for allegedly ramming his car into crowds of people at a Christmas market in Magdeburg in late December.

I speak of Taleb Jawad al-Abdulmohsen, the Saudi refugee and apparent apostate from Mecca turned virulent anti-Islam critic, who reportedly sought to punish his white German hosts for allowing more Muslims into the country by the most extreme means possible—i.e., by killing them and their children. Otherwise, actual true-believing Muslims might come into the country from places like Saudi Arabia and start doing terrible things like killing them and their children, you see.

Non-Aryan Nation
The German authorities’ best effort to take the sting out of this bizarre situation was to hijack the careless driver’s exceedingly anti-immigration views to label al-Abdulmohsen as being a kind of neo-Nazi—yes, that’s right, to say he was a white supremacist, even though he is blatantly an Arab immigrant.

In fact, if you look at the man’s full list of opinions expressed online, they are an incoherent mishmash of beliefs, from support for right-wing parties, to claiming to be a left-winger, to seemingly everything in between. Helpfully, therefore, it has proved eminently possible for the suspected terrorist to be linked to the AfD, at least tangentially. The fact that he could equally as well have been linked to other, far more leftist, causes was obviously a complete irrelevance.

Stung, the AfD has in its turn since tried to claim that al-Abdulmohsen’s avowed anti-Islam stance is but a cunning ploy, intended to disguise his true subsurface jihadist intent. AfD figures cite an Islamist doctrine called taqqiyah, which allows adherents to lie about their true worldviews when operating amidst the presence of the occidental infidels whom they secretly wish to destroy from within.

This might sound like a paranoid “far-right” conspiracy theory, but you could well argue that Germany’s own long-ruling liberal and left-wing politicians and media class operate a form of secular taqqiyah of their own too, whenever lying relentlessly about the true catastrophic effects of their thoughtless mass importation of Islam into the territories of the former Reich.

Forget the idea of Germany going fascist this February. Contrary to Friedrich Merz’s claims, perhaps the true problem with modern-day Germany is that it just isn’t Nazi enough?