December 16, 2024

Source: Bigstock

If you saw a large group of men running toward you, dressed in tight Lycra bearing the words “QUEER RUNNING CLUB,” what would you do? Personally, I’d start running too—right in the opposite direction. And, if I happened to be Jewish, I might try running all the faster.

For obvious reasons, gays don’t like Gaash—particularly not Omer Gaash, a homosexual Israeli photographer who recently offered his valuable services to the Queer Running Club (QRC) of London, whose members spend their days jogging between the bushes in the city’s parks, very possibly horizontally. Although Gaash’s only desire for the QRC was “for you lovelies to have wonderful photos” within which to record their public group-based activities for all posterity, it soon turned out there was a problem.

Relay-Race Relations
As he had initially offered them his services for free, it is possible the QRC did not immediately realize Gaash was Jewish. This rapidly proved “problematic,” however, as, for some bizarre reason, besides dashing about everywhere bow-legged in high heels with their arms flapping around like girls and going “OOH!” the QRC are also intensely interested in the current unfolding military and geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Therefore, a representative contacted Gaash with the following “friendly” message, once they discovered he was from the Land of Zion: “QRC has been, and continues to be, firmly pro-Palestine. I just wanted to make sure that aligns with you.”

“The Democrats are now increasingly the party of indigestible foreign-harvested coffee dregs like Ilhan Omar who want to throw open the borders to the entire Jew-hating, Muslim diaspora.”

But possibly implied support for the gay-killers and Jew-slaughterers of Hamas didn’t wholly “align” with Gaash’s own personal values, so he messaged the QRC right back refusing to confirm or deny his utterly irrelevant opinions vis-à-vis the Gaza Strip. The QRC then barred him from taking any live-action snaps of them at all, saying they were “not in a position to separate our politics from our running.”

Why not? Because of a doctrine known as “intersectionality,” the idea oppressed minority groups should all stick together, no matter how severe their own personal differences may be, thereby to defeat the true overarching shared Ultimate Evil of cishetero male white Western imperialism.

The QRC website claims their club is “political by its very nature” as “When queer people support one another it’s a political act of radical care against systemic oppressions that have historically held our community back,” even though Jogging Whilst Gay has never yet been considered a criminal offense under U.K. law.

The group’s basic idea seems to be that, under classic leftist intersectionality doctrine, the homophobes of Hamas are oppressed by the Islamophobes of Israel, who must therefore be oppressed in turn by the Jewphobes of the Queer Running Club who, in their own turn, would doubtless be subsequently oppressed themselves by the homophobes of Hamas, should they ever go for a quick shared sprint together through the remains of central Rafah, the very definition of a circular firing squad.

My Enemy’s Enemy Is My…Enemy Too?
The Queer Running Club has now been reported to authorities by the U.K. Lawyers for Israel group, accused of acts of illegal anti-Hebrewsexual discrimination. Yet some may see a dark intersectional irony in some Jews like Omer Gaash’s current plight. The thing about intersectionality is that by taking someone else’s side in an utterly unrelated cause, by definition you then have to take sides against someone else in it all too. Therefore, you force other people to take sides against you at the same time, as certain unfortunate Jews themselves are now also finding.

The official origins of intersectionality lie with a black U.S. lawyer named Kimberlé Crenshaw, who coined the term in 1989 just to be able to better moan about being black and a woman simultaneously, but in practice you could say certain Jews had already been employing a variant of the same basic ideology for decades.

As David Cole has previously explained on this very website, in the aftermath of the Holocaust, some Jews concluded white people as a whole were their natural enemy—even white people from the countries who had fought against the Nazis, and in whose lands many such Jews now dwelled, having been welcomed into them as refugees by…anti-Nazi white people.

To lessen the potential threat of becoming victims of purges and pogroms at the hands of any future white Hitlers ever again, certain deeply misguided Jewish-led organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) therefore agitated for mass non-white immigration into white America and Europe.

Such groups’ assumption was that imported chocolate-skinned golems would also be likely to suffer racism at the hands of the ever-genocidal palefaces and thereby become the Israelites’ automatic allies, increasing the Jews’ political leverage against the wicked whites—different oppressed ethnic groups joining together against a shared oppressor, a classic definition of intersectionality.

Big mistake.

Roches Always Survive
Within a British context, the clearest example was surely Barbara Roche, Immigration Minister within Tony Blair’s left-wing New Labour Junta from 1997 onward. The descendent of East End Jews, but not a good one like Alf Garnett, Roche was allegedly part of a deliberate (and deliberately unadvertised) New Labour plot to “rub the right’s noses in diversity” by legislating to create a massively multicultural society where none had existed before.

In 2003 she openly boasted that “My being Jewish informs me totally, informs my politics. I understand the otherness of ethnic groups. The Americans are ahead of us on things like multiple identity.” So are schizophrenics.

If she really knew her history of Jewish immigration into Britain, Roche could ask her fellow wandering tribeslady Bat Ye’or why she and her family had to flee to the (former) safety of London from the recently “decolonized” Egypt back in 1957. Clue: It had something to do with pogrom-loving Muslims, one of whom quite literally whipped the Ye’ors Londonwards out of the airport…

“I love the diversity of London. I just feel comfortable,” Cock-Roche said in 2011, her hard work infesting the place with black-scarab Arabs done. I wonder how “comfortable” she’d feel today being carted into one of the city’s Islamist-infested NHamaS hospitals that I wrote about on this site last week, needing urgent treatment for a large machete wound inflicted by a passing highly diverse Somali pirate shouting, “Death to the Zionist scum!” Oh, but don’t be silly; Roche is an ex–Cabinet Minister. She’ll be able to pay to go private.

The Unwisdom of Solomon
This isn’t to say that all Jews collectively were responsible for the present-day “browning” of Europe and America—most of the New Labour Cabinet were not Jewish Labour at all, but pure white British—yet certain isolated malign Jewish individuals and bodies, like Barbara Roche, the ADL, and George Soros, do bear some guilt for the crime. Sadly, the collective punishment is currently being borne by the ordinary innocent Jews of the West, not the guilty minority.

You’ll have seen the recent scenes of imported intersectional Moroccan Muslims going on a mass “Jew-Hunt” through the streets of Amsterdam against visiting Israeli soccer fans, for example. Matches involving Israeli teams in Europe represent an obvious easy target for such anti-Jewish mobs, so much so that a game between Israel and Belgium was recently moved from Brussels to Hungary, where it was safer.

And why was it safer for Jews to be in Hungary? Because there are almost no Muslims there, because the nation’s current unacceptably white-skinned leader, Viktor Orban, sensibly refuses to listen to the Soroses of this world and let all the Sinbads in.

Guess which current European leader the ironically Hungarian-born Soros most hates, and does his level best to undermine, therefore? That’s right: Viktor Orban. Why? Because if Hungary remains white, it supposedly may one day become Nazi just like Germany once was, meaning it will be no safe space for the Jews—despite the fact it’s one of the few remaining actual safe spaces for Jews left in all of Europe, because there are no Muslims there. But, in the name of shared intersectional safety in numbers, fools of this particular deluded Jewish mindset argue it might be a good idea to let all the Muslims into Hungary anyway.

What Jew Do That For?
Meanwhile, I can’t help but notice that, despite Donald Trump being so pro-Jew he may as well build a Wailing Wall on the border with Mexico, 79 percent of self-defeating American Jews voted for Kamala Camel-Lover in November, even though the Democrats are now increasingly the party of indigestible foreign-harvested coffee dregs like Ilhan Omar who want to throw open the borders to the entire Jew-hating, Muslim diaspora.

So, to protect themselves from the evil white Republican Nazis like Trump, who are demonstrably not Nazis at all, and who tend to mainly support and accept Jews as well-integrated “honorary whites” who look and act much like they do, the overwhelming majority of the American Bagel-Ballot have suicidally decided to vote instead for the Islam-importing party of rabid Hamas-worshippers, and those who actively wish to exterminate them.

That same plan has worked out absolutely flawlessly for the Jews in today’s newly pogrom-ridden Amsterdam, hasn’t it? When it comes to their growing persecution by Muslims here in today’s West, I tend to take the side of the Jews—it would be nice if more of them tried doing the same themselves sometime, that’s all.

For “intersectionality,” just read “insanity.”

Columnists

Sign Up to Receive Our Latest Updates!