Source: Bigstock

See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Such were the age-old policy recommendations of the Three Wise Monkeys, since adopted by the total chimps who now rule over us.

I have just viewed an exchange on a U.K. current affairs show involving a former Labour Party adviser named Mike Buckley, who claimed to be totally ignorant of a well-known domestic news story in which a schoolteacher from Batley had been forced into hiding for his life after showing an image of the False Prophet Muhammad during a Religious Education lesson, leading to the area’s typically tolerant towelheads offering to immediately divorce his head from his neck.

The host could not believe it: Given the blanket level of media coverage, for a Brit not to have heard of the Batley case would be akin to a Frenchman not knowing about the Bataclan. Was Buckley telling the truth here, or just Blind Man Bluffing so as to avoid discussion of unwelcome non-liberal truths he’d really rather not acknowledge? If so, he would hardly be the first.

Old Before Their Crime
An Afghan named Mada Pasa was recently escorted across the English Channel despite seemingly making open threats on camera to shoot Reform U.K. Party leader Nigel Farage and “be married with” his sister. “Is this the kind of man we really want in Britain?” asked Nigel. Apparently so. Despite Pasa quite literally having a tattoo of a Kalashnikov on his face, still we are told that those pouring in here are all poor harmless refugees, that most of the 45-year-old men are actually 12-year-old girls, and that whiteness is the real problem in white countries anyhow, and always has been.

Here’s a quick gallery of some of the “children” allowed into Britain as refugees in recent years; some such oddly wizened and hairy infants later went on to earn their Blue Peter badges by committing acts of murder and terrorism, including one who planted a bomb on a train, just like Dennis the Menace. With typical progressive moral myopia, authorities and medics consider it to be “inhumane” to subject such vulnerable individuals to intrusive tests to determine whether or not they are actually children or fully grown adults, such as looking at them for approximately 0.27 seconds with their eyes.

In 2018, a genuine schoolboy from Ipswich posted a photo of a non-genuine schoolboy named Siavash Shah online, asking the question “How’s there a 30-year-old man in our Maths class?” Reportedly, Shah was actually a married Iranian father of two children; they were probably in the year below him, together with his wife, who, being Muslim, no doubt really was aged under 16. Parents who complained about this were “dismissed as racist,” as opposed to simply “sentient.”

One way Shah tried to blend in was by wearing a pair of glasses to look more like a stereotypical speccy student swot. The ones who actually needed spectacles here were his lefty teachers. These fools must be literally blind to reality. But sometimes reality has a tendency to creep up on you from behind nonetheless…and stab you.

Kaba the Stabba
An absolutely classic example of contemporary leftism’s Three Unwise Monkeys attitude at work came in an October court case revolving around Chris Kaba, a black London gang member shot in the head by a white police marksman in 2022 whilst trying to run cops over in his car, before immediately being acclaimed as yet another martyr to his melanin.

The officer responsible was then dragged through a senseless witch hunt, charged with things like “murder,” “courage,” “realism,” and “acting rather sensibly, given the circumstances.” To avoid “prejudicing the jury” by allowing them to know the plain truth about this reputed human, the court was not told beforehand about Kaba’s extensive criminal record, which included such delights as shooting a man in a nightclub, helping slice open a rival in a phone shop, and being a member of London’s notorious “67” drug gang (pronounced “six-seven,” its members being unable to count past ten, except when calculating the value of heroin shipments, at which point they all suddenly morphed into Rain Man).

No such restrictions were placed upon Kaba’s Congolese-origin family and champions amongst the political class, however, who loudly proclaimed him an “aspiring architect” who “could light up a room at parties,” very possibly by firebombing them. According to one gushing black Labour MP, Chris was also “looking forwards to becoming a father and getting married.” His prospective wife herself probably wasn’t, though, as she had reportedly obtained a court order against him on domestic violence grounds. Despite this, fraudulent U.K. “feminist” outfit the Women’s Equality Party put out a tweet sympathizing with Kaba, using the BLM slogan “No justice, no peace.” No functioning vision, either.

For justice to remain blind here, the State evidently felt the jury had to remain so too. Yet, despite the authorities’ best attempts to disable them every bit as much as that big tall stone lady standing on top of the Old Bailey with an ossified rag clamped over her face, jurors took no longer than three hours to find the policeman innocent of all charges, and two hours 59 minutes of that was just spent playing cards and doing crosswords.

The case concluded, media were free to report the truth about the past of this talented young architect (of his own demise). At which point, another blinkered black Labour MP, Kim Johnson, stood up in what now increasingly resembles the Housing Project of Commons and claimed, inevitably, that Kaba was the victim here—as, by accurately reporting his status as the member of a black criminal gang, “the media are using racist gang tropes to justify his killing.” Don’t gangsta apologists like her use “racist police tropes” to justify the persecution of innocent white coppers?

Those Who Can’t See, Teach
Thank God one member of the jury was not Chris Kaba’s old schoolteacher, who was interviewed in The Times following the verdict. Despite Kaba’s first conviction coming aged 13 when he was arrested for carrying a large knife to a street brawl, this colossally dim-witted woman insisted, like the victims of Monty Python’s Doug and Dinsdale Piranha, that “People who knew Chris have mourned him. We have not changed our opinion because of what we have read.” But why not, if “what we have read” is conclusive proof that he was a giant criminal?

During her time teaching him, she said, Kaba had been “an intelligent boy” who “made good progress in reading and writing,” having eventually learned how to hold a pen midway through Year Six. “There was no indication that he would end up in this lifestyle,” she added. “All my pupils were nice, polite boys. They were well behaved and academically bright.”

Then, in the very next breath, Mrs. Magoo further explained how “The [local] gangs made [online] videos in which they threatened people and the kids just loved it. They watched them all the time and would re-enact them in the playground, wearing balaclavas and things.” Furthermore, “A pupil once brought a screwdriver to school. He was angry about something and tried to stab it into another’s chest,” necessitating immediate police involvement.

The teacher then revealed that three former pupils had gone on to be convicted murderers. The Times carried photos of them. All three were black.

I can understand how, if you’d never seen a tadpole before, you’d be shocked to meet up with it again a few months later and find it had become a big fat green frog. But if you teach black kids who reenact black gang violence in the playground, and then they grow up to become violent black gang members as adults, then how could you possibly end up being remotely surprised? Only because, these same children being black, you have successfully hypnotized yourself into not seeing the truth.

Crossing the Finnish Lines
This kind of eye-poking lunacy has been bubbling for decades. Researching this piece, I came across a jaw-dropping article from 2000 in which, following the rape of a pram-pushing Finnish woman by two black immigrants in front of her 2-year-old daughter, white lefty Lapps fell over themselves backwards to excuse the perpetrators. It wasn’t the rapists’ fault, said sociologist Sari Nare, as, being from elsewhere, “they may not have been aware” that publicly double-teaming a mother in front of her own baby “carries with it a powerful taboo in our culture.” Where were they from? Sodom?

Some 8 to 10 percent of recent Finnish rapes were performed by a foreigner back then, despite only 1.65 percent of the population hailing from abroad. How to explain this oh-so-puzzling fact? Chief Inspector Kalle Kekomaki hypothesized that maybe “a Finnish woman regards it as more of a crime when the perpetrator is foreign,” so is just more likely to report it, possibly due to “her own role” in what happened. Her “own role”? Sari Nare explains further: “In this country, the relationship between the sexes is based to a large degree on trust…that the man can control his desires” and not just force-fill every available orifice within a 10-mile radius.

According to the article, many adorably naive non-whites cannot be trusted to do so, however. Quite reasonably, blacks’ and browns’ own inherited cultural cues teach them that, following friendly social interaction, “the woman herself is responsible for what happens next” when the immigrant automatically and understandably rapes her, as the poor man naturally “imagines he is satisfying the woman’s needs and doing her a favor, however much she might appear not to appreciate his intentions” by, for example, screaming very loudly at him to stop.

Another extraordinary opinion given was that being raped by a native white person close to you could leave you with much “deeper wounds” than being raped by unknown African strangers, so the latter experience wasn’t really half as bad. “Never mind, love; at least he wasn’t your dad!” Finnish sex-crime units must be trained to reassure all future white complainants.

Furthermore, as blonde female Finns are supposedly only ever sighted in Africa or Arabia spreading themselves naked within porn mags, “this can quite easily affect attitudes.” So, you see, it’s all just an innocent cultural misunderstanding, like when an American visits Britain, asks for some potato chips, and is confused to receive a carton of French fries instead, because in England that’s what chips are. When a Zimbabwean visits Finland, ties you up, and rapes you, don’t take it personally! He’s not a bad person, it’s a mere genital faux pas, that’s all.

Norway to Treat Women
In order to avoid such blameless errors, in Norway many confused non-white male immigrants are now handed an instructive and helpful “Please Don’t Rape Anybody!” manual, containing obscure and little-known native customs like “To force someone into sex is not permitted in Norway, even when you are married to that person.”

However, to remain racially polite, such manuals blindly present ethnically inverted fictional scenarios in which white Norwegian males are seen wickedly tempting non-white Muslim incomers like the lovely Hassan (“a good man…honest and well-liked”) into getting native blondes drunk and primed for abusing, before asking simple beginners’ questions like “How should Hassan react?” If the real-life Hassan answers, “By raping her!” Hassan appears to still be allowed to remain in the country regardless.

In Scandinavia today, there is now more rape than at any point since the Vikings. And what, one wonders, could possibly have caused such problems? Naturally, the citizenry must be blinded with red-hot race-pokers into remaining wholly answerless, and the truth remain perpetually concealed, as if beneath a lead-lined political burka.

Some would say color blindness is the best policy in all such matters, but if blacks and browns really are more prone to extreme criminal violence, as many uncensored figures persistently suggest, then in practice “color blindness” really just amounts to sheer blindness to color.