Russia Watch

The People v. Putin

December 16, 2011

Multiple Pages
The People v. Putin

On the Monday after the Russian Duma election, thousands gathered in Moscow and other cities to protest election fraud that was so blatant, even many formerly sympathetic Western observers noted it. Arrests were carried out with surprising mildness while many around the world watched events filmed and uploaded by amateurs.

Just before 4AM in Moscow, news went around that political activist Alexey Navalny had “disappeared.” He’d been arrested and taken to an out-of-the-way police station in Izmailovo, where he was allowed to issue one Tweet and was then held incommunicado. He was supposed to then be transported to Kitay-gorod police station. Somewhere between the two he apparently vanished for a couple of hours while near-panic ensued among his followers. Eventually he “reappeared” in the right police station.

Navalny was given 15 days in detention for resisting police in carrying out their duties. So he was not there physically at the large meeting that gathered in Moscow on December 10, but a statement he’d written was read aloud to the 50 thousand or so protesters. He urged people to keep fighting and said Putin’s henchmen cannot arrest and beat up hundreds of thousands. His message was that we are not animals nor slaves, and we have had enough.

“They are still speaking out in public and to the media, though Russia’s once and future president has made it clear that he is displeased with them.”

Given the weather and the fact that previous protests had been broken up violently, the numbers and the courage are impressive. They are still speaking out in public and to the media, though Russia’s once and future president has made it clear that he is displeased with them.

Putin and his acolytes have over the years managed to exert almost total control over the traditional media. The little that remains outside their immediate influence can be frightened at any time by a notice of unpaid taxes. There is not a firm in Russia unaware of what happens when the government decides that back taxes are owed.

So the ability to oppose the regime and the crony capitalism that supports it has fallen on the bloggers, among whom Navalny is possibly the best known. His blog directs angry and accurate accusations at corrupt large businesses that all have strong links with the state apparatus. He is thus a leading figure in the public anger at the Russian system’s corruption and criminality.

Vladimir Putin’s appeal was that he had apparently restored order in the country after the chaos of the Yeltsin years. The good luck of high oil and gas prices made everyday life for most Russians better than in living memory. Putin had also promised to restore Russia’s status as a great power. In exchange for such prosperity, most Russians seemed prepared to overlook ever-increasing authoritarianism.

Russia has not become a great power that everyone fears. The war in Georgia showed up Russia’s military inadequacy. Estonia and other Baltic states have consistently defied “big brother.” When Russia told NATO not to attack Libya because they would oppose it, NATO effectively replied, “You and whose army?”

More importantly, the economic upturn has not lasted. A good deal of the new wealth that was created has been siphoned off by the new oligarchs, the officials, Mr. Putin’s mates. Opposition parties have been suppressed, candidates have not been allowed to stand, and meetings have been dispersed violently. Law and order are a joke. Corruption and violence are rife.

Putin has announced that there will be no investigation and that troubles have been stirred up by the Americans, who clearly bribed all those tens of thousands who turned out on a freezing-cold day to protest.

But Putin underrated his opposition. It is organized and tech-savvy. Protest meetings this time around were arranged with social media and mobile phones.

Trying to present a more modern, Western image than Putin’s crude macho posturing, President Medvedev posted on Facebook that he intended to investigate electoral fraud. Facebook’s faceless hordes shouted him down.

The Russian government has been involved in social media for quite some time. Anybody who has posted about Russia in the West knows of the ill-written and boringly repetitive comments that flood in whenever a piece goes up that is critical of Putin’s regime.

There’s an aimless bewilderment in the government’s reaction to post-election events. Somebody clearly prevailed on Putin not to order the toughest possible responses. There are reports of some sympathy among the police, though there are also reports of them saying that they know these people are enemy agents because the Boss told them so.

Many Russians still believe the old chestnut about it being the Americans’ fault. But a growing segment—one that participates in social media both foreign and domestic—will be difficult to control. Their dissatisfaction will spread and their ability to organize themselves (hitherto the government’s preserve) will be admired and emulated. Mr. Putin does not have long to control a situation with which he seems ill-equipped to deal. Presidential elections are due in March, traditionally a month of Russian uprisings and revolts.

 

SUBSCRIBE
For Email Updates


Comments


The opinions of our commenters do not necessarily represent the opinions of Taki's Magazine or its contributors.