A recent study from the University of Michigan finds that the ever-popular youth expression “that’s so gay” is actually harmful to gay, lesbian, and bisexual students.
According to CBS News:
Data suggests gay, lesbian and bisexual college students who heard “that’s so gay” more frequently were more likely to report feeling isolated and to suffer negative health symptoms, such as headaches, poor appetite or eating problems.
Coming from Detroit—a city whose citizens live under the constant threat of far more concrete forms of harm than colloquialisms—the study claims that the near-ubiquitous phrases “that’s so gay” and “you’re so gay” are not merely harmless expressions. The offending phrases have long been used on campuses to denote lack of coolness, insufficient fashionableness, or, in extreme cases, total and complete lameness. But now it seems they may actually pose a health threat to “sexual minorities” at high schools and university campuses.
Head researcher Michael Woodford says that the phrase “you’re so gay” is subtly hostile because it suggests “that there is something wrong with being gay.” (Apparently he’s been too busy conducting bogus academic studies to ever watch an episode of Seinfeld, or else he’d realize he’s begging for a joke with that line.) He goes on to say that “hearing such messages…can cause stress, which can manifest in headaches and other health concerns.”
So what’s the solution for all those gay students taking Advil and leaving their shawarma platters unfinished because of all this horrifying stress?
Woodford issued a press release that answers the question:
Policies and educational programs are needed to help students, staff and faculty to understand that such language can be harmful to gay students. Hopefully, these initiatives will help to eliminate the phrase from campuses.
Woodford isn’t clear about how exactly one might go about “eliminating” a slang expression from common usage. Fines? Public flogging? Plainclothes Speech Police handing out tickets whenever they hear somebody call a pair of shoes “gay”? It would be a daunting task for the enforcers of correct speech.
“That’s so gay” is one of contemporary slang’s more durable pejorative phrases. And until fairly recently, no one with an IQ larger than their hat size needed to have it spelled out that in certain contexts the term has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
In my high-school years, “gay” was commonly used to mean unfashionable, tacky, or uncool. But while most of the cultural effluvia from my high-school years have gone the way of Spandau Ballet, using “gay” as a synonym for “unhip” or “annoying” seems to keep creeping back into common usage with remarkable staying power. “Cool” would seem to be the only other term that has successfully passed through several generations of high schoolers without losing its popularity. (A small achievement, perhaps, but when was the last time you heard anybody use “groovy,” “nifty,” or “Daddy-O” in a sentence?) Is there just something about calling annoying things “gay” that instinctively feels right, especially to young adults?
Many of us who recall the phrase from youth were surprised to see it making headlines again over the past few years. In 2007, California school authorities disciplined a Mormon schoolgirl because she used the dreaded phrase “that’s so gay” in retaliation against peers who teased her about her religion. Her parents subsequently filed a lawsuit on First Amendment grounds, which they lost. In 2010, Anderson Cooper had his crinoline petticoats all twisted because of a movie trailer in which comic actor Vince Vaughn uttered these menacingly hateful lines:
Electric cars are gay. Not homosexual gay, but my-parents-are-chaperoning-the-dance gay.
Cooper denounced the dialogue as “unacceptable” and huffed and puffed like some PC version of an affronted Victorian damsel hearing the word “testicles” spoken in public. But apparently Vince Vaughn and his screenwriter are a good deal more clever and astute than Cooper, because the joke’s point is that “gay” has two meanings in contemporary parlance—“homosexual” and “uncool.” By drawing attention to the distinction, the joke is by definition not “homophobic,” a subtlety apparently lost on Cooper in his rush to be righteously outraged.
I don’t recall anybody in high school ever being brought up on hate-speech charges when they described a homework assignment or a lunch-hour detention as being “gay.” In college, I can recall even openly gay students who would often, and without self-conscious irony, use the term “gay” as a good-humored way to deride things they found trite or ineffectual.
So what changed? Did the nineties, that monumentally dreary decade of identity politics and Kurt Cobain and women in army boots, turn everybody so hysterically sensitive to language that we can no longer even distinguish between two basically unrelated meanings of a commonly used word? (And when did the homosexual community gain exclusive rights over the term “gay,” anyhow? After all, they stole it from the happy community.) Slang, especially youth slang, is as natural and uncontrollable a phenomenon as the weather—how is it possible to police such a thing, assuming policing it is even desirable?
The Totalitarianism Lite crowd who sternly use words such as “eliminate” and “eradicate” regarding disapproved language may have a tough time with this one. Some slang terms disappear, forever to be derisively consigned to history’s dustbin, while others seem to keep coming back into fashion, and “gay” appears to be one of the latter. Calling certain things “gay” just feels right, and more establishment options such as “insipid” or “weak” look, well, insipid and weak in comparison.
Imagine two hypothetical conversations:
Q: Do you like the band Coldplay?
A: No, I find their music distastefully fey, tacky, insipid, and uninspiring, lacking in both energy and forcefulness to a degree that I find quite off-putting. They’re a bland and mainstream group whose artistic vision is, from my perspective, singularly limited and unoriginal.
Q: Do you like the band Coldplay?
A: No, their music is totally gay.
Which response might strike a young adult as being more evocative and succinct?
Somebody should tell the people behind the University of Michigan study that being totalitarian, self-righteous, and priggish about language is, all things considered, pretty gay. That’s electric-cars, parents-chaperoning-the-dance gay, assuming they can even understand the difference.
Copyright 2013 TakiMag.com and the author. This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order reprints for distribution by contacting us at firstname.lastname@example.org.