Politics

The First Alt-Right Congressman?

January 29, 2018

Multiple Pages
The First Alt-Right Congressman?

In the 2016 Wisconsin Republican primaries, businessman Paul Nehlen (pronounced “kneelin’”) challenged soulless autocrat Paul Ryan but managed to snag only 15.9% of the vote. This year he is challenging Ryan again, with one big difference—in the interim, he has pushed the Overton Window so far to the right, he might as well have taken a sledgehammer and smashed it to pieces.

On policy issues, Nehlen remains the same meat-and-potatoes MAGA type that he was in 2016—he’s against open borders, free trade, gun control, abortion, and amnesty. These are the positions that initially earned him the backing of Steve Bannon and a regular writing gig for Breitbart.

What has changed—and what has caused Bannon and Breitbart to aggressively disavow him and purge all his former articles from their site—is that he’s said it’s “awesome” to be white and that Jews hold a degree of influence over American policy and the media that extends far beyond their estimated 2% of the population.

To my knowledge, several Americans—perhaps most at this sad point—would passionately argue against Nehlen’s contention that it’s OK to be white, or at least they’d do so in public, because they are well aware of the consequences of doing otherwise. But despite all the wailing and shirt-rending outrage, I haven’t seen anyone even bother to refute the whole “Jew” thing.

“Asking a question is not an act of hatred. I’m flabbergasted that this even needs to be said.”

I’m asking for a friend—can anyone offer irrefutable statistical evidence that Jewish people do not account for more than 2% of media ownership and influence over American politics? It’s an honest and sincere question. I mean, I constantly hear this contention that Jewish people are disproportionately influential waved away as a “trope” and a “vicious myth,” but I’d really like to see the numbers. When people deflect from the matter at hand to call people nasty names and avoid the question, I’ve learned to suspect that they’ve already lost the argument.

The huge schism that seemingly occurred five minutes after Donald Trump’s election amid the amorphous and ultimately indefinable “Alt-Right” movement hinged on the “JQ”—the “Jewish Question.” Those who still refer to themselves as “Alt-Right” do not hesitate to ask the Jewish Question, while those who used to have no problem with the term “Alt-Right” but now call themselves “New Right” (and are smeared by stalwart Alt-Righters as the “Alt-Lite”) forbid the JQ from ever being asked.

Instead, this “New Right” is loudly pro-Israel, strains to distance itself from the Alt-Right (sometimes even more vociferously than it distances itself from leftists), and openly smears anyone who dares question the extent of Jewish influence in American and global politics and media as “Nazis.” Sometimes it seems as if the only difference between them and neocons is that they swear a lot.

But despite all their efforts and virtue-signaling, the Alt-Lite get called “Nazis” anyway. Constantly. Funny how that works.

It’s all ridiculous, hyperbolic, and counterfactual, of course. The JQ is even a question that Karl Marx addressed—he referred to Ferdinand LaSalle as a “Jewish nigger,” wrote that “The Jews of Poland are the smeariest of all races,” and said that the “worldly religion of the Jew” was “huckstering.”

To my knowledge, these statements are far harsher than anything Paul Nehlen has said about Jews, but for some reason Marx gets a pass and Nehlen doesn’t. Maybe it’s because Marx is the father of modern leftism. Maybe it’s the fact that Marx was Jewish. Maybe it’s a combination of both. I’d only be speculating. Unlike most modern writers, I don’t claim the ability to read minds.

I’m the type who feels that no questions should be forbidden, so according to the way the modern left frames the issue, that makes me a Nazi, no questions asked, no arguments allowed. I realized a long time ago—and especially since reading The Black Book of Communism—that since the 1930s, the fanatical left has smeared anyone who dares stray from their ideology one iota as “fascists” and “Nazis,” so it’s a meaningless smear. The Nazi Party was disbanded in 1945, so it’s technically impossible for anyone to be a Nazi these days, but why let facts get in the way? The left overused the term “racist” to the point where many people didn’t care being called one anymore, so I’ve noticed that over the past year, they’ve just flipped all the cards and called anyone who disagrees with them a “Nazi” who deserves to be punched or killed. Reason and linguistic accuracy never mattered to True Believers, anyway. What they really need to fear is overusing the word “Nazi” to the point where no one cares being called one, anyway, because at that point, what rhetorical weapons will the left have left?

To my knowledge—I mean, I’ve been challenging everyone to find evidence to the contrary and have so far found no takers—Donald Trump, who is probably the most pro-Zionist president in US history, has never directly addressed “white people” as a constituent group. Yet he is constantly smeared as a white supremacist and a Nazi.

Nehlen, however, is explicitly pro-white and of late has persistently hammered on the JQ. He has repeatedly appeared on popular Alt-Right podcast “Fash the Nation,” with “Fash” being shorthand for “fascist.” He has used the (((triple parentheses))) to identify people as Jewish. He has referred to Zionist Republicans as the “merchant right,” which refers to the ubiquitous “Happy Merchant” cartoon caricature of a greedy Jew. He has referred to himself as “red-pilled.” A month or so ago, he claimed he was reading Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique, a sprawling work from 1998 whose subtitle is An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements.

In the modern political climate, these are all unforgivable sins. I would suggest this is because of relentless and systematic propaganda rather than intellectual honesty, but that’s just like a Nazi to say that, right?

This month, Nehlen was banned from Twitter for a week after he posted several images that appear to demonstrate that the ownership and staff of major media outlets such as CNN, The New York Times, and NBC News are very top-heavy with Jewish people.

Mind you, this is the same media that’s constantly carping about how everything is “too white.” How people are able to sleep at night while supporting such flagrant double standards is beyond me.

Again, I didn’t see a single soul attempting to factually refute what these images allege about the primary players at these news outlets. Instead, I saw people screaming bloody murder at the simple fact that someone dared to allege it. This is, naturally, an emotional rather than a factual reaction, but they’ll call you a Nazi even for pointing out that.

Nehlen was only reinstated on Twitter after agreeing to delete the offending tweets. Otherwise, just like Donald Trump, he has offered no apologies and continues to counterpunch. If he lives to see the day, Nehlen will square off against Paul Ryan and another Republican challenger on August 14.

Asking a question is not an act of hatred. I’m flabbergasted that this even needs to be said.

Despite what many leftists try to insist, never in my life have I given a fig about someone’s ethnicity; I only resist being framed and extorted for historical crimes I didn’t commit based solely on my skin color. From the start, my problem has been with assholes. And in my book, anyone who wants to silence or destroy you merely for asking honest questions is an asshole.

The score so far: Paul Nehlen 1, Assholes 0.

SIGN UP
Daily updates with TM’s latest