When news broke on September 11, 2012 that an American embassy and consulate were besieged it was distressing. It only became alarming when the White House and American news organizations reported that the date’s significance was little more than a coincidence.
By the next day, after the first United States ambassador in thirty-three years had been assassinated, this narrative was altered. The attack in Egypt was still a “fluke,” but maybe not Libya. For once it seemed even the vaunted ignorance of the American populace had been overestimated.
I don’t believe in coincidences, although many lamentably do. I believe there are enormous and continual efforts made by powerful interests to convince the public that incredibly improbable happenstances continuously occur.
So to the extent that various incidents have been “coincidenced” right out of existence, they bear repeating.
Where that projectile originated is in some dispute. Probably it was from the American Navy, which was conducting exercises in the immediate vicinity. Possibly it was from terrorists in a boat below. But mistake or massacre, it happened.
When former Sen. Pierre Salinger, past correspondent for ABC News, provided documentation he went from respected colleague to laughingstock in one day. This is presidential power and media complicity in action.
Eyewitnesses reported seeing a missile rise from the ocean’s surface up to an aircraft which subsequently exploded and fell into the sea. These people were located from every conceivable angle. One even had a serendipitous photo from that night which seemed to show a missile in the background.
The government said that all these people were hallucinating and didn’t see what they said they saw. Some literally didn’t know up from down. The smoking-gun photo was a fake, then it was an illusion, and then it simply went away. Everyone made a “coincidentally” corroborating mistake. Meanwhile, 230 innocents died.
Another interesting “coincidental” occurrence was April 20, 1999, when it was reported that two disaffected youths stormed Columbine High School, leaving 21 injured and 13 murdered.
Few doubted the original narrative, yet strange and chilling stories began to emerge. Parents who rushed to the scene stated that authorities refused to enter the building to stop the carnage for an hour or more. Many parents say they retrieved their own weapons but were barred from doing the job that the local SWAT team was too cowardly to attempt, and that those same officers may have accidentally shot fleeing students.
Moreover, the plausible account of dual disgruntled loners with a few homemade pipe bombs became dubious once it was revealed the number of incendiaries was nearer to one hundred, including at least two twenty-pound propane timed devices.
Some witnesses were emphatic that they saw additional shooters. Still worse, these were not vague allegations from a confused environment. Many who claimed there were other assailants gave detailed physical descriptions or specifically identified individuals.
There were multiple bombs that no one saw being positioned. They required enormous physical strength simply to bring, let alone place throughout the school. Dozens of students all “mistakenly” agreed there was a named third shooter.
An episode that few recall happened a couple months after the September 11 attacks and involved another airliner in New York. All 260 onboard were killed in addition to five on the ground.
American Airlines Flight 587 departed from JFK Airport on November 12, 2001, and immediately crashed into the Belle Harbor neighborhood of Queens. Within a few hours it was established that a pilot error due to “wake turbulence” caused the aircraft to lose altitude and explode into flames. But that wasn’t what witnesses reported.
Over half of 349 eyewitnesses—more than 175 people—claimed to have seen an explosion or fireball on the airplane before it went down. Among them were police and firefighters on the scene. In professional terms, these are referred to as “expert witnesses,” yet their testimony was utterly discounted.
Of added import, al-Qaeda took responsibility for the incident and listed it among their successful actions. An informant likewise supported the claim. He says the cause was a shoe bomb, which would later become infamous in another case.
What is the best way to defuse a terrorist attack? Call it anything else. Terrorism’s function is to create terror, especially after the largest terrorist assault in American history. Yet what if it wasn’t terrorism at all? No panic. No threat we (again) failed to stop. No collapse of the airline industry. If it’s terrorism everything is in jeopardy; if it’s pilot error it’s tragic, but…well…these things happen.
Any inconvenient witnesses? They didn’t see what they thought they saw. Coincidence. Timing of the event? Coincidence. The fact that it was located in New York City? More coincidence.
It’s astounding how often inconvenient facts can be “coincidenced” into a palatable narrative where officials do no wrong and the public need not worry.
There is a point when even the stupidest among us laughs out loud. Otherwise, we are the ones at whom they’re laughing.
Copyright 2013 TakiMag.com and the author. This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order reprints for distribution by contacting us at email@example.com.