Imagine a pair of people, the first of whom is, by any standard you could want to pick, better than the second?not an unimaginable scenario. In such a case, most people wouldn’t have a problem saying, “If B became as smart as A, or as kind, or as pretty, or as industrious, etc., it would be a good development”; on the other hand, few would go so far as to say that it would be better for B to become A. Self-improvement is, in some literal sense, a betrayal of who-I-am-right-now, but it doesn’t offend our belief in the inherent worth of every human person. Saying that we would prefer a world in which there were two A’s rather than an A and a B, on the other hand, does.
Pinker seems to think that bioethical “dignity” talk is just a cover for “skittishness toward biomedical advances.” He’s right that the Yuck Factor is certainly a big part of it, but if “Become someone better, but don’t become someone else” is a maxim?admittedly a slippery one?that we’re willing to apply to individual people, why not apply it to the human race?
Copyright 2013 TakiMag.com and the author. This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order reprints for distribution by contacting us at firstname.lastname@example.org.